Thank You For Reaching Out To Us
We have received your message and will get back to you within 24-48 hours. Have a great day!

Welcome to Haposoft Blog

Explore our blog for fresh insights, expert commentary, and real-world examples of project development that we're eager to share with you.
aws-vpc-best-practices
latest post
Dec 16, 2025
20 min read
AWS VPC Best Practices: Build a Secure and Scalable Cloud Network
A well-built AWS VPC creates clear network boundaries for security and scaling. When the core layers are structured correctly from the start, systems stay predictable, compliant, and easier to operate as traffic and data grow. What Is a VPC in AWS? A Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) is an isolated virtual network that AWS provisions exclusively for each account—essentially your own private territory inside the AWS ecosystem. Within this environment, you control every part of the network design: choosing IP ranges, creating subnets, defining routing rules, and attaching gateways. Unlike traditional on-premise networking, where infrastructure must be built and maintained manually, an AWS VPC lets you establish enterprise-grade network boundaries with far less operational overhead. A well-designed VPC is the foundation of any workload deployed on AWS. It determines how traffic flows, which components can reach the internet, and which must remain fully isolated. Thinking of a VPC as a planned digital neighborhood makes the concept easier to grasp—each subnet acts like a distinct zone with its own purpose, access rules, and connectivity model. This structured layout is what enables secure, scalable, and resilient cloud architectures. Standard Architecture Used in Real Systems When designing a VPC, the first step is understanding the core networking components that every production architecture is built on. These components define how traffic moves, which resources can reach the Internet, and how isolation is enforced across your workloads. Once these fundamentals are clear, the three subnet layers—Public, Private, and Database—become straightforward to structure. Core VPC Components Subnets The VPC is divided into logical zones: Public: Can reach the Internet through an Internet Gateway Private: No direct Internet access; outbound traffic goes through a NAT Gateway Isolated: No Internet route at all (ideal for databases) Route Tables: Control how each subnet sends traffic: Public → Internet Gateway Private → NAT Gateway Database → local VPC routes only Internet Gateway (IGW): Allows inbound/outbound Internet connectivity for public subnets NAT Gateway: Enables outbound-only Internet access for private subnets Security Groups: Stateful, resource-level firewalls controlling application-to-application access. Network ACLs (NACLs): Stateless rules at the subnet boundary, used for hardening VPC Endpoints: Enable private access to AWS services (S3, DynamoDB) without traversing the public Internet. Each component above plays a specific role, but they only become meaningful when arranged into subnet layers. IGW only makes sense when attached to public subnets. NAT Gateway is only useful when private subnets need outbound access. Route tables shape the connectivity of each layer. Security Groups control access between tier to tier. This is why production VPCs are structured into three tiers: Public, Private, and Database. Now we can dive into each tier. Public Subnet (Internet-Facing Layer) Public subnets contain the components that must receive traffic from the Internet, such as: Application Load Balancer (ALB) AWS WAF for Layer-7 protection CloudFront for global edge delivery Route 53 for DNS routing This ensures inbound client traffic always enters through tightly controlled entry points—never directly into the application or database layers. Private Subnet (Application Layer) Private subnets host the application services that should not have public IPs. These typically include: ECS Fargate or EC2 instances for backend workloads Auto Scaling groups Internal services communicating with databases Outbound access (for package updates, calling third-party APIs, etc.) is routed through a NAT Gateway placed in a public subnet. Because traffic can only initiate outbound, this layer protects your application from unsolicited Internet access while allowing it to function normally. Database Subnet (Isolated Layer) The isolated subnet contains data stores such as: Amazon RDS (Multi-AZ) Other managed database services This layer has no direct Internet route and is reachable only from the application tier via Security Group rules: This strict isolation prevents any external traffic from reaching the database, greatly reducing risk and helping organizations meet compliance standards like PCI DSS and GDPR. AWS VPC Best Practices You Should Apply in 2025 Before applying any best practices, it’s worth checking whether your current VPC is already showing signs of architectural stress. Common indicators include running out of CIDR space, applications failing to scale properly or difficulty integrating hybrid connectivity such as VPN or Direct Connect. When these symptoms appear, it’s usually a signal that your VPC needs a structural redesign rather than incremental fixes. To address these issues consistently, modern production environments follow a standardized network layout: Public, Private Application, and Database subnets, combined with a controlled, one-directional traffic flow between tiers. This structure is widely adopted because it improves security boundaries, simplifies scaling, and ensures compliance across sensitive workloads. #1 — Public Subnet (Internet-Facing Layer) Location: Two subnets distributed across two Availability Zones (10.0.1.0/24, 10.0.2.0/24) Key Components: Application Load Balancer (ALB) with ACM SSL certificates AWS WAF for Layer-7 protection CloudFront as the edge CDN Route 53 for DNS resolution Route Table: 0.0.0.0/0 → Internet Gateway Purpose: This layer receives external traffic from web or mobile clients, handles TLS termination, filters malicious requests, serves cached static content, and forwards validated requests into the private application layer. #2 — Private Subnet (Application Tier) Location: Two subnets across two AZs (10.0.3.0/24, 10.0.4.0/24) Key Components: ECS Fargate services: Backend APIs (Golang) Frontend build pipelines (React) Auto Scaling Groups adapting to CPU/Memory load Route Table: 0.0.0.0/0 → NAT Gateway Purpose: This tier runs all business logic without exposing any public IPs. Workloads can make outbound calls through the NAT Gateway, but inbound access is restricted to the ALB. This setup ensures security, scalability, and predictable traffic control. #3 — Database Subnet (Isolated Layer) Location: Two dedicated subnets (10.0.5.0/24, 10.0.6.0/24) Key Components: RDS PostgreSQL with Primary + Read Replica Multi-AZ deployment for high availability Route Table: 10.0.0.0/16 → Local (No Internet route) Security: Security Group: Allow only connections from the Application Tier SG on port 5432 NACL rules: Allow inbound 5432 from 10.0.3.0/24 and 10.0.4.0/24 Deny all access from public subnets Deny all other inbound traffic Encryption at rest (KMS) and TLS in-transit enabled Purpose: Ensures the database remains fully isolated, protected from the Internet, and reachable only through controlled, auditable application-layer traffic. #4 — Enforcing a Secure, One-Way Data Flow No packet from the Internet ever reaches RDS directly. No application container has a public IP. Every hop is enforced by Security Groups, NACL rules, and IAM policies. Purpose: This structured, predictable flow minimizes the blast radius, improves auditability, and ensures compliance with security frameworks such as PCI DSS, GDPR, and ISO 27001. Deploying This Architecture With Terraform (Code Example) Using Terraform to manage your VPC (the classic aws vpc terraform setup) turns your network design into version-controlled, reviewable infrastructure. It keeps dev/stage/prod environments consistent, makes changes auditable, and prevents configuration drift caused by manual edits in the AWS console. Below is a full Terraform example that builds the VPC and all three subnet tiers according to the architecture above. 1. Create the VPC Defines the network boundary for all workloads. 2. Public Subnet + Internet Gateway + Route Table Public subnets require an Internet Gateway and a route table allowing outbound traffic. 3. Private Application Subnet + NAT Gateway Allows outbound Internet access without exposing application workloads. 4. Database Subnet — No Internet Path Database subnets must remain fully isolated with local-only routing. 5. Security Group for ECS Backend Restricts inbound access to only trusted ALB traffic. 6. Security Group for RDS — Only ECS Allowed Ensures the database tier is reachable only from the application layer. 7. Attach to ECS Fargate Service Runs the application inside private subnets with the correct security boundaries. Common VPC Mistakes Make (And How to Avoid Them) Many VPC issues come from a few fundamental misconfigurations that repeatedly appear in real deployments. 1. Putting Databases in Public Subnets A surprising number of VPCs place RDS instances in public subnets simply because initial connectivity feels easier. The problem is that this exposes the database to unnecessary risk and breaks most security and compliance requirements. Databases should always live in isolated subnets with no path to the Internet, and access must be restricted to application-tier Security Groups. 2. Assigning Public IPs to Application Instances Giving EC2 or ECS tasks public IPs might feel convenient for quick access or troubleshooting, but it creates an unpredictable security boundary and drastically widens the attack surface. Application workloads belong in private subnets, with outbound traffic routed through a NAT Gateway and operational access handled via SSM or private bastion hosts. 3. Using a Single Route Table for Every Subnet One of the easiest ways to break VPC isolation is attaching the same route table to public, private, and database subnets. Traffic intended for the Internet can unintentionally propagate inward, creating routing loops or leaking connectivity between tiers. A proper design separates route tables: public subnets route to IGW, private subnets to NAT Gateways, and database subnets stay local-only. 4. Choosing a CIDR Block That’s Too Small Teams often underestimate growth and allocate a VPC CIDR so narrow that IP capacity runs out once more services or subnets are added. Expanding a VPC later is painful and usually requires migrations or complex peering setups. Starting with a larger CIDR range gives your architecture room to scale without infrastructure disruptions. Conclusion A clean, well-structured VPC provides the security, scalability, and operational clarity needed for any serious AWS workload. Following the 3-tier subnet model and enforcing predictable data flows keeps your environment compliant and easier to manage as the system grows. If you’re exploring how to apply these principles to your own infrastructure, Haposoft’s AWS team can help review your architecture and recommend the right improvements. Feel free to get in touch if you’d like expert guidance.
react-serve-components-vulnerabilities
Dec 12, 2025
15 min read
React Server Components Vulnerabilities And Required Security Fixes
The React team has disclosed additional security vulnerabilities affecting React Server Components, discovered while researchers were testing the effectiveness of last week’s critical patch (React2Shell). While these newly identified issues do not enable Remote Code Execution, they introduce serious risks, including Denial of Service (DoS) attacks and potential source code exposure. Due to their severity, immediate upgrades are strongly recommended. Overview of the Newly Disclosed Vulnerabilities Security researchers identified two new vulnerability classes in the same React Server Components packages affected by CVE-2025-55182. High Severity: Denial of Service (DoS) CVE-2025-55184 CVE-2025-67779 CVSS Score: 7.5 (High) A maliciously crafted HTTP request sent to a Server Function endpoint can trigger an infinite loop during deserialization, causing the server process to hang and consume CPU indefinitely. Notably, even applications that do not explicitly define Server Functions may still be vulnerable if they support React Server Components. This vulnerability enables attackers to: Disrupt service availability Degrade server performance Potentially cause cascading infrastructure impact The React team has confirmed that earlier fixes were incomplete, leaving several patched versions still vulnerable until this latest release. Medium Severity: Source Code Exposure CVE-2025-55183 CVSS Score: 5.3 (Medium) Researchers discovered that certain malformed requests could cause Server Functions to return their own source code when arguments are explicitly or implicitly stringified. This may expose: Hardcoded secrets inside Server Functions Internal logic and implementation details Inlined helper functions, depending on bundler behavior Important clarification: Only source-level secrets may be exposed. Runtime secrets such as process.env.SECRET are not affected. What Is Affected and Who Needs to Take Action The newly disclosed vulnerabilities impact the same React Server Components packages as the previously reported issue, and affect a range of commonly used frameworks and bundlers. Teams should review their dependency tree carefully to determine whether an upgrade is required. Affected Packages and Versions These vulnerabilities affect the same packages and version ranges as the previously disclosed React Server Components issue. Affected packages react-server-dom-webpack react-server-dom-parcel react-server-dom-turbopack Vulnerable versions 19.0.0 → 19.0.2 19.1.0 → 19.1.3 19.2.0 → 19.2.2 Fixed Versions (Required Upgrade) The React team has backported fixes to the following versions: 19.0.3 19.1.4 19.2.3 If your project uses any of the affected packages, upgrade immediately to one of the versions above. ⚠️ If you already updated last week, you still need to update again. Versions 19.0.2, 19.1.3, and 19.2.2 are not fully secure. Impacted Frameworks and Bundlers Several popular frameworks and tools depend on or bundle the vulnerable packages, including: Next.js React Router Waku @parcel/rsc @vite/rsc-plugin rwsdk Refer to your framework’s upgrade instructions to ensure the correct patched versions are installed. Who Is Not Affected Apps that do not use a server Apps not using React Server Components Apps not relying on frameworks or bundlers that support RSC React Native Considerations React Native applications that do not use monorepos or react-dom are generally not affected by these vulnerabilities. For React Native projects using a monorepo, only the following packages need to be updated if they are installed: react-server-dom-webpack react-server-dom-parcel react-server-dom-turbopack Upgrading these packages does not require updating react or react-dom and will not cause version mismatch issues in React Native. Recommended Solutions and Mitigation Strategy While upgrading to the fixed versions is mandatory, these vulnerabilities also expose broader weaknesses in dependency management and secret handling that teams should address to reduce future risk. Immediate Fix All affected applications should upgrade immediately to one of the patched versions: 19.0.3 19.1.4 19.2.3 Previously released patches were incomplete, and hosting provider mitigations should be considered temporary safeguards only, not a long-term solution. Updating to the fixed versions remains the only reliable mitigation. Automate Dependency Updates to Reduce Exposure Time Modern JavaScript ecosystems make it difficult to manually track security advisories across all dependencies. Using tools such as Renovate or Dependabot helps automatically detect vulnerable versions and create upgrade pull requests as soon as fixes are released. This reduces response time and lowers the risk of running partially patched or outdated packages in production. Ensure CI/CD Pipelines Can Absorb Security Upgrades Safely Frequent dependency upgrades are only safe when supported by reliable automated testing. Maintaining comprehensive CI/CD pipelines with sufficient test coverage allows teams to apply security updates quickly while minimizing the risk of breaking changes. This enables faster remediation when new vulnerabilities are disclosed. Remove Secrets from Source Code to Limit Blast Radius Secrets embedded directly in source code may be exposed if similar vulnerabilities arise again. Store secrets using managed services such as AWS SSM Parameter Store or AWS Secrets Manager Implement key rotation mechanisms without downtime Even if source code is exposed, properly managed runtime secrets significantly limit real-world impact. Why Follow-Up CVEs Are Common After Critical Disclosures It is common for critical vulnerabilities to uncover additional issues once researchers begin probing adjacent code paths. When an initial fix is released, security researchers often attempt to bypass it using variant exploit techniques. This pattern has appeared repeatedly across the industry. A well-known example is Log4Shell, where multiple follow-up CVEs were reported after the first disclosure. While additional disclosures can be frustrating, they usually indicate: Active security review Responsible disclosure A healthy patch and verification cycle Final Notes Some hosting companies set up quick fixes, yet those aren't enough on their own. Keeping dependencies updated is still a top way to stay safe from new supply-chain risks. If your application uses React Server Components, reach out to Haposoft now! We'll figure out what’s impacted while taking care of the update without mess. It means going through your dependencies one by one, making sure everything builds right in the end.
critical-vulnerability-react-server-components
Dec 04, 2025
10 min read
Security Advisory: Critical Vulnerability in React Server Components (CVE-2025-55182)
On December 3, 2025, the React team revealed a critical Remote Code Execution vulnerability in React Server Components (RSC). It affects several RSC packages and some of the most widely used React frameworks, including Next.js. A fix is already out, so the urgent step now is simply checking whether your project uses these packages—and updating to the patched versions if it does. Overview of the Vulnerability A newly reported flaw allows unauthenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE) on servers running React Server Components. Type: Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution CVE: CVE-2025-55182 (NIST , GitHub Advisory Database) Severity: CVSS 10.0 (Maximum severity) This means an attacker could execute arbitrary code on the server without any form of authentication, giving them full control of the affected environment. The issue is caused by a flaw in how React decodes payloads sent to React Server Function endpoints. A maliciously crafted HTTP request can trigger unsafe deserialization, leading to remote code execution. React will publish additional technical details once the patch rollout is fully completed. Scope of Impact Any application that supports React Server Components may be exposed, even if it never defines any Server Function endpoints. The vulnerability exists in the underlying RSC support layer used by multiple frameworks and bundlers. Your application is not vulnerable if: Your React code does not run on a server, or Your application does not use a framework, bundler, or plugin that supports React Server Components. Traditional client-only React applications are unaffected. Affected Versions and Components The vulnerability is tied to specific versions of the React Server Components packages and to the frameworks that depend on them. Identifying whether your project uses any of these versions is the first step in determining your exposure. Vulnerable Packages The issue affects the following packages in versions 19.0, 19.1.0, 19.1.1, and 19.2.0: react-server-dom-webpack react-server-dom-parcel react-server-dom-turbopack Affected Frameworks and Bundlers Several frameworks that rely on these packages are also impacted, including: Next.js React Router (when using unstable RSC APIs) Waku @parcel/rsc @vitejs/plugin-rsc Redwood SDK Security Fix and Recommended Actions The React team has released patched versions, and major frameworks have issued corresponding updates. Applying these fixes promptly is the only reliable way to remove the vulnerability from affected projects. Patched Versions The React team has released fixed versions: 19.0.1 19.1.2 19.2.1 (or any version newer than these) Upgrading to a patched release is mandatory to eliminate the vulnerability. Framework Updates Framework maintainers have also published security updates. For example, Next.js users must upgrade to one of the following patched versions: next@15.0.5 next@15.1.9 next@15.2.6 next@15.3.6 next@15.4.8 next@15.5.7 next@16.0.7 Other ecosystems (React Router, Redwood, Vite plugin, Parcel, Waku, etc.) also require upgrading to their latest patched versions. What Development Teams Should Do Now We recommend the following immediate steps: Audit all projects to confirm whether React Server Components or related frameworks are in use. Check package versions for the affected libraries listed above. Upgrade to the patched versions immediately if your application falls within the impacted scope. Review deployment environments for any unusual activity (optional but advisable for security). Document and report the findings to your internal security or project stakeholders. Conclusion This vulnerability (CVE-2025-55182) is one of the most severe vulnerabilities ever disclosed within the React ecosystem, and it may impact a wide range of modern React-based applications. To maintain security and prevent potential exploitation, all teams should: Review their applications, Identify affected components, and Apply the necessary upgrades without delay. If you need a security audit or patch support within your React-based web development projects, Haposoft is ready to step in.
cta-background

Subscribe to Haposoft's Monthly Newsletter

Get expert insights on digital transformation and event update straight to your inbox

Let’s Talk about Your Next Project. How Can We Help?

+1 
©Haposoft 2025. All rights reserved